What’s the alternative the author is advocating for? They lament that there isn’t motivation because it’s not a partisan scandal, but that seems like a good th

What’s the alternative the author is advocating for? They lament that there isn’t motivation because it’s not a partisan scandal, but that seems like a good thing because then reactions aren’t clouded by two-party tribalism. Also, naive politicians aligning themselves with (what they see as) an up and coming industry is not at all surprising, and certainly not new. If they just want the donations returned, that sounds great, although I’m not sure how that works—-I guess the money goes to the bankruptcy pot to help cover investor losses? Not sure that even sounds that great either. As horrible as his must be for people who lost their money, I wouldn’t want my (imaginary) political donation to be immediately handed to some crypto investor who fell for FTX’s lies. If the author just wants regulatory clarity, that’s what we all want.