The idea behind this post could be done in an interesting way. It could have looked at real languages and examined why they--despite some promise--didn't succee

The idea behind this post could be done in an interesting way. It could have looked at real languages and examined why they--despite some promise--didn't succeed. Unfortunately thats not what the article did. Instead it asks us to feign confusion why bitfuck didn't become a mainstream language. Maybe because it was a bitfucking joke from the start?