> So Wikipedia should stay, and iron out the crinkles instead. Let's just not expect it to be perfect. They could, but the author is pessimistic that nothing w

> So Wikipedia should stay, and iron out the crinkles instead. Let's just not expect it to be perfect. They could, but the author is pessimistic that nothing will change at all because of inertia resisting such change. He used Fram as example and the sole McDonald's in a food desert as an analogy.