3 ms·
Looks neat. I'm just curious, what is the motivation for naming this `gitopen` rather than `git-open`, which allows `git open` with no configuration?
by oinksoft 15y ago
Looks neat. I'm just curious, what is the motivation for naming this `gitopen` rather than `git-open`, which allows `git open` with no configuration?
- arnorhs 15y agoHonestly, I simply wasn't aware of the convention. Thanks for pointing that out.