3 ms·
Sure — but equally so is the response to Bell’s inequality that we must live in a non-deterministic world… even though that’s a purely extraneous assumption (ie
by zmgsabst 4y ago
Sure — but equally so is the response to Bell’s inequality that we must live in a non-deterministic world… even though that’s a purely extraneous assumption (ie, we’re non-local either way).
Yet, for longer than I’ve been alive physicists have blathered about this “quantum truth” that’s purely an artifact of extraneous assumptions, so far as anyone can show me.
- akimball 4y agoIs it extraneous to interpret schrödinger psi as a probability amplitude? If not, then all fundamental interactions are stochastic.
- naasking 4y ago> Sure — but equally so is the response to Bell’s inequality that we must live in a non-deterministic world Bohmian mechanics and Many Worlds are both deterministics interpretations of QM.