4 ms·
I assume environmentalists like technological advancement? And a population who can afford or contribute to a tax base where the government can support R&D for
by refurb 4y ago
I assume environmentalists like technological advancement? And a population who can afford or contribute to a tax base where the government can support R&D for more green technologies?
How about medical care? Do environmentalists like advances in cancer care? And a system where the population has the money to access them?
Or social security? Paying money to retirees so they can live in relative comfort?
Population declines are a major issue. In some Asian countries the number of workers per retiree is going from 20 to 1, down to 2 to 1 if the population declines continues.
Growth means more money. Not just for things like consumer items you so distain, but also social programs that keep people healthy and in relative comfort.
- bamboozled 4y agoYes, except we can have technological progress without 8 billion people, many of whom are aging ?
- refurb 4y agoHow do you pay for it? Economic growth means more money for things we want. I mean we can have technological advancement with fewer people. But it’s likely going to be slower and fewer people can afford it.