3 ms·
I am sure GP is aware of the difference between reality and the map of reality. But creating maps are shown to not correspond to reality and others that do a p
by abdullahkhalids 4y ago
I am sure GP is aware of the difference between reality and the map of reality.
But creating maps are shown to not correspond to reality and others that do a pretty good job for parts of reality do say something about what the fabric of the cosmos could and could not be.
The most striking example of this is Bell's experiments which wipe out entire classes of fabrics.
- namaria 4y agoSure, understanding the logic behind validating reality models is very useful. Surely, you also can see that pretending like valid reality models are more then useful, but a representation of the very nature of existence, is just a flight of fancy. We don't know what is reality, why is reality, and the bulk of it lies eternally beyond us, towards past and future. Sure we can figure out reality, it's all about tunnels baby! Says the ant.
- zmgsabst 4y agoSure — but equally so is the response to Bell’s inequality that we must live in a non-deterministic world… even though that’s a purely extraneous assumption (ie, we’re non-local either way). Yet, for longer than I’ve been alive physicists have blathered about this “quantum truth” that’s purely an artifact of extraneous assumptions, so far as anyone can show me.
- akimball 4y agoIs it extraneous to interpret schrödinger psi as a probability amplitude? If not, then all fundamental interactions are stochastic.
- naasking 4y ago> Sure — but equally so is the response to Bell’s inequality that we must live in a non-deterministic world Bohmian mechanics and Many Worlds are both deterministics interpretations of QM.