4 ms·
OP question mentions specific network types, while reply uses a vague "million-book library" metaphor, but at least mentions LLM? Also arbitrarily sorts human {
by nullish_signal 4y ago
OP question mentions specific network types, while reply uses a vague "million-book library" metaphor, but at least mentions LLM?
Also arbitrarily sorts human { teacher, journalist, writer } as "people who do custom work with each client" which makes a bit of sense for a Teacher in a small-class environment. But Writers and Journalists write at SCALE, and while each may speak with gusto to individuals just as well as they do their job, tailoring custom content to individuals is not their job.
Not to mention that individual-tailored model files are very handy with AI, share-able as those diles may be.
I call ChatGPT on you!!! And also do not know anything about your question, OP...
- dtagames 4y agoI wouldn't deign to have ChatGPT write my comments. They're all me! Obviously, an author's audience can include more than one person. But every good piece of human writing is tailored for some audience. That was my point. You've heard the expression, "Know your audience?" ChatGPT cannot.
- nullish_signal 4y agoChatGPT's "audience" can range from "hate speech for anti-bias training" to "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Deliver Impassioned Speech to The World" I would also like to use the No True Scotsman fallacy, and assert that no Human can ever really "know" or "write for" anybody's perfect preferences.
- dtagames 4y agoI wasn't asking for perfect preferences. I was asking for minimal cognizance, which the tool cannot provide. ChatGPT is more like a parrot than tech dreamers like to admit.
- nullish_signal 4y agoI'll grant you that ChatGPT is more Parrot than All-Seeing Oracle, but no Parrot (or even Google) will take nginx errors for input, and give me back chmod and chown commands to fix the permission issues. AND! the commands it gave me were tailored to match my user and any directories/websites i told it I was working on ! !