>"and in a physics sense (you cannot control an idea in the minds of other," I think we should add the caveat "yet", to your quote. I imagine it's physiologica

>"and in a physics sense (you cannot control an idea in the minds of other," I think we should add the caveat "yet", to your quote. I imagine it's physiological to control ideas in people's brains if you could accurately and correctly map neurons to people's thoughts.