3 ms·

It's not the the painting was found to be sufficiently transformative, but rather that the photograph was ruled to be ineligible for copyright protection in the

It's not the the painting was found to be sufficiently transformative, but rather that the photograph was ruled to be ineligible for copyright protection in the first place. I'm not familiar with Belgian copyright law so I can't really comment on how reasonable that ruling is. Under American copyright law it would be absurd.

nulbyte 4y ago
> I'm not familiar with Belgian copyright law As I understand it, this is a case in the country of Luxembourg, not the Belgian province of the same name.
- CrazyStat 4y ago
  Oops, my mistake. Not sure where I got Belgium from.