I think what you're doing is just saying "there's stuff we understand" and "stuff we don't understand" and you're calling all of it "Physics". And then you say

I think what you're doing is just saying "there's stuff we understand" and "stuff we don't understand" and you're calling all of it "Physics". And then you say "some other biological or physical process that so far isn't identified". The assumption here is that we'll eventually "identify" everything, which is another very bizarre, if not voodoo, assumption. It seems magical to think that humans evolved our perception and thought in this environment to be such things that could eventaully "identify" everything. But just in case you don't actually think that. Then you're calling "Physics" all of the things, including the things that we'll never "identify". Again, seems very much like a magic claim.