4 ms·
I am speaking *nothing* about compelling the use of cash between two parties. My only and consistent point that is that it is silly for a nation to put a ceili
by flandish 4y ago
I am speaking *nothing* about compelling the use of cash between two parties.
My only and consistent point that is that it is silly for a nation to put a ceiling amount on its currency (cash) trading hands in physical meatspace form.
For the amount will stay while inflation will not and the cohort of people “bumping” into this limit will increase over time.
It’s not about compelling cash. Move away from that.
It’s about a nation limiting the amount that can be used in the “name” of “fighting terrorism.”
Nonsense.
- tgv 4y agoit’s not silly, and it’s not (just) terrorism. Crime can only flourish with black money.
- flandish 4y agoIf stopping crime involves treating normal people (in my country they are called “innocent”) like criminals via a transaction limit that may change with a vehicle so important as cash… then the method is unjust. A nation has no right to, in the name of “fighting terrorists”, accidentally consider or treat an innocent person as a criminal.