4 ms·
1. You aren't refuting the existence of honor or the fact that virtues of truthfulness and fairness had to be displayed in order to retain respect in the past.
by forensic 15y ago
1. You aren't refuting the existence of honor or the fact that virtues of truthfulness and fairness had to be displayed in order to retain respect in the past. You are just saying sociopaths still existed and still lied. The difference is that in the past they had to maintain an image of truthfulness, which limited their criminal activity.
2. No social system is perfect and the honor system of course was not either. However, if an American aristocrat in, say, 1830, was openly and publicly caught in a lie that was obviously selling out the nation, he would likely be convicted of something, or he would be publicly shamed, or he would receive vigilante reprisals.
It wasn't a perfect system - honor systems by definition are not - but the reprisals demonstrate that there was a code of honor that went beyond the law. Honor by definition is a code of conduct with social reprisals that goes beyond the law.
American social conduct was heavily policed by codes of honor. Maybe you think codes are stupid but nevertheless they had a tremendous influence on social behavior, as they do in any society where a code is implemented.
Not everyone follows the code of honor, but those who blatently break the code are usually dishonored, shamed, ostracized, and face physical and finanical vigilante justice. The existence of this "street justice" worked as a deterrent so that the Dick Cheneys and Lloyd Blankfeins of the time had to work really hard to keep their skeletons in their closet.
Trial by jury is only one step removed from mob justice. Individuals should be tried by the court of public opinion and punished by that court. If public opinion widely sees Blankfein as a treasonous fraudster, it is right that he be lynched. And if the courts are too corrupt to charge him then the duty falls to the general public.
It's not naive to recognize that brutal and swift vigilante street justice keeps outrageous criminal activity in check. You want to paint me as some kind of utopian but I'm actually saying society needs more bloodshed, more violence, more vigilantism, more lynching, more mob rule. Mob rule and the judgment of the mob is the basis of democracy. Legal technicalities are not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honour http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honour
"Even personal shame and humiliation was preferable to a tarnished honor or the hint of corruption. When Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton was accused of corruption for making secret payments to a man named James Reynolds, Hamilton revealed he had been set up and was paying blackmail to Reynolds following an affair with Mrs. Reynolds. Duels over honor were common in the era--Hamilton was killed in one, as was Hamilton's son."
- http://conservapedia.com/Founding_Fathers http://conservapedia.com/Founding_Fathers
“Nobody can acquire honor by doing what is wrong”
- Thomas Jefferson
"Some men who are not real men love other things about themselves, but the real man believes that his honor is dearer than his life; and a nation is merely all of us put together, and the nation's honor is dearer than the nation's comfort and the nation's peace and the nation's life itself."
- Woodrow Wilson
“No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave.”
- Calvin Coolidge
"All the great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy,
hope."
- Winston Churchill
"There are three classes of men; lovers of wisdom, lovers of honor, and lovers of gain. "
- Plato
"Who sows virtue reaps honor."
- Leonardo da Vinci
"I love the name of honor, more than I fear death. "
- Julius Caesar
"Leadership to me means duty, honor, country. It means character, and it means listening from time to time."
- George W. Bush
"The difference between a moral man and a man of honor is that the latter regrets a discreditable act, even when it has worked and he has not been caught. "
- H. L. Mencken
"You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind next to honor."
- Aristotle
"Life every man holds dear; but the dear man holds honor far more precious dear than life."
- William Shakespeare
- beagle3 15y agoI agree with you about how society should work - more shaming, harsher public response towards repeat offenders. I disagree about your rose tinted view of the past. We could both pick a few historical events that would support our conflicting view of the past. But I find it hard to take you seriously. Quotes from political speeches, from the likes of George Bush and the conservapedia? Are those supposed to be reliable? If these are the sources you base your view on then we really do live in different planets.
- forensic 15y agoJefferson is a poor source to you? Those quotes demonstrate the cache that the concept of honor had.
- beagle3 15y agoNo. Quotes are in general a poor source, especially one line quotes which were probably taken out of context (I don't blame you for taking them out of context on purpose, but time is an important context for e.g. what "honor" actually means, as you agreed earlier on this thread). If you trust quotes - Bush said "No new taxes" (and there were), Obama said he'll close guantanamo as soon as he goes into office -- he even signed such an order in his first month -- but guantanamo is still operating. Quotes are PR. Actions speak louder than words. And the actions had always been to worship the successful, as in the examples I gave, the Cheney example you gave, and the Burr/Hamilton I wasn't even aware of.
- forensic 15y agoIt's overly simplistic to say people always worship the powerful. Caesar was assassinated by the entire senate. Democracy in America was created on the basis of the rejection of power-worship. You seem to have your pet way of interpreting history. I'm not arguing that honor and other values were some kind of omnipotent force for good I'm just saying they existed. When you assume that I'm a complete idiot you're failing to "assume good faith" which is one of the conduct requirements to maintain your honor. In a court of law, a lawyer who fails to assume good faith is dishonored and his arguments are automatically invalid. Honor is still used in our justice system.