3 ms·
If that's the intention you can update your original comment to say the "open" standard, because your definition of standard is not universal. And then I would
by lifthrasiir 4y ago
If that's the intention you can update your original comment to say the "open" standard, because your definition of standard is not universal. And then I would have instantly agreed because I've experienced this firsthand.
Besides from that technicality though, do you really think that publicly available standards would have changed the situation? I don't think so---Chrome (and to be clear, most other browsers) has supported tons of closed standards anyway.
- ddevault 4y ago> If that's the intention you can update your original comment to say the "open" standard, because your definition of standard is not universal. And then I would have instantly agreed because I've experienced this firsthand. No. A closed standard is not a standard. > Besides from that technicality though, do you really think that publicly available standards would have changed the situation? I don't think so---Chrome (and to be clear, most other browsers) has supported tons of closed standards anyway. I think it might have helped, yes.
- lifthrasiir 4y ago> I think it might have helped, yes. Please elaborate.