3 ms·
This is already happening with regularity, at least in California. Engineering is about solving part of the problem first, then iterating. If you look at what
by electrondood 4y ago
This is already happening with regularity, at least in California.
Engineering is about solving part of the problem first, then iterating. If you look at what they've accomplished only in the last year with FSD, I find it highly unlikely that 0-disengagement drives don't become the norm by the end of 2023.
Currently, 90+% of drives have 0 safety-critical disengagements, and 50+% have no human-discomfort-related disengagements.
- rootusrootus 4y agoAre you referring to Tesla's FSD effort, or Waymo? I hear excuses when I point this out, but lane keeping and adaptive cruise on the Model 3/Y are inferior to the competition now. AP was a selling point when the Model 3 first came out, it has become a bit of a joke now. If you buy a Model 3 today, it comes with an asterisk. If you want cruise control, beware, adaptive cruise has notable bugs and there is no option to turn it off and go old-school.
- lelanthran 4y ago> If you look at what they've accomplished only in the last year with FSD, I find it highly unlikely that 0-disengagement drives don't become the norm by the end of 2023. > Currently, 90+% of drives have 0 safety-critical disengagements, and 50+% have no human-discomfort-related disengagements. No one is going to put their pre-teen child in a car for a 5 hour trip when there is a 10% chance that the car will crash. And yet you think that such a thing will be the norm in 12 months or less?
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Engineering is about solving part of the problem first, then iterating. And fraud is about selling solutions to parts of the problems you haven’t yet solved. While there are engineering criticisms of Tesla FSD, that’s not the issue here, so presenting definitions of engineering is a non-sequitur.