3 ms·
Same with Romania and Eastern Europe in general. Western EU countries criticize them immensely for corruption in the public eye, yet their governments, banks an
by ChuckNorris89 4y ago
Same with Romania and Eastern Europe in general. Western EU countries criticize them immensely for corruption in the public eye, yet their governments, banks and major corporations profit immensely from the business deals corruption there enables them to do, and so they have a vested interest to keep just enough corruption there so they can keep profiteering, while maintaining enough rule of law so that their investments there are safe and ensures the free flow of profits back home.
- nayroclade 4y agoThis is boilerplate conspiratorial nonsense. West European countries would benefit far more from East European countries being free from the economic drag imposed by endemic corruption. The EU internal market overall would be much richer and stronger, and those banks and corporations would have a better quality consumer and labor base. Banks and corporations can make plenty of money in high-trust societies just as in low-trust ones, and they get more regulatory certainty as well.
- JetSpiegel 4y agoMost corruption cases benefit the German companies, so no, they would not benefit more, otherwise they would just lobby their local governments for fiscal transfer to the poorer countries. The opposite happens, the German constitutional court can veto foreign budgets if they don't pay the Danegeld (i.e. not wasting all european funds buying goods and services from Germany). The litmus test is this: can a EU country use european funds to create a new carmaker to compete with central european carmakers? Hell no. But you can spend all european funds buying cars from Germany, that's never wasteful. The EU has no policy to enrich the entire union, only the central countries. The EU funds are basically a workaround for direct transfers of money from the German government to German companies, via foreign countries. I'm not from a Eastern European country, but I do live in a poor Eastern European economy, it's the same dynamic.
- ChuckNorris89 4y ago>This is boilerplate conspiratorial nonsense It's not though. EU wide corruption scandals prove this. Western EU companies routinely pay bribes to dump plastics and toxic waste in Romanian landfills under the disguise of "recyclable material". This way those private companies save a few bucks to stay competitive, and their countries keep getting to call themselves "green" by exporting their environmental damage across the border. IKEA, plus Austrian and German wood companies routinely paid bribes in the Romanian timber industry to be able to perform mass deforestation. Austrian companies, like STR*BAG, paid bribes to Romanian politicians to get preferential juicy building contracts, sometimes using EU funds, for highways that never get completed due to various technicalities that got intentionally omitted from the contract so that the building company can just bail out from the deal without having built anything while getting paid in full. Basically, the EU taxpayer is paying for a western EU company to make bank in the east, all through EU funds funneled trough Romania, to build roads that never get built. All this high level corruption benefits major western EU companies, and corrupt eastern EU politicians a lot. Western EU politicians also benefit from this as the major companies in their countries lobby for them to keep this corrupt system going so they can keep making bank. The EU is a great thing, but it's also ripe with corruption that's costing the taxpayers tens of billions.
- jq-r 4y agoYou're exactly right. In Croatia everything of any value is owned or being sold to German companies and they pretty much own the place (or at least what worth anyway). All of this is facilitated by the same government for the last 30 years or so. The same government has been completely and obviously corrupted to the core, but never, even much of a peep criticised by the EU.They are all friends there. As long as the public is not openly rioting, EU likes this arrangement.
- t0bia_s 4y agoYes, in Czechia we have same corrupted politics and business. Since summer 2021 prices goes up around 30% on food, 50% for energy. Most ridiculous is that our power plants make enough energy for entire country and 15% are sold abroad, but... All energy is auctioned on the Leipzig Stock Exchange for 600% higher price than it is actually made (1 kWh cost around 1 CZK to made, it's sold for 6-7 CZK and rising. Now our gonverment need to cap prices from our taxes so state budget has this year recorded deficit since 70’s around 350 bilion CZK. Trust in gonverment is very low, voter turnout was around 48% in regional elections. Our politicians blame war in Ukraine, it's ridiculous.
- tasuki 4y agoI'm Czech, though somewhat disconnected from local situation/politics. > Most ridiculous is that our power plants make enough energy for entire country and 15% are sold abroad, but... All energy is auctioned on the Leipzig Stock Exchange for 600% higher price than it is actually made (1 kWh cost around 1 CZK to made, it's sold for 6-7 CZK and rising. Why is that ridiculous? We make something cheap, and sell it abroad for profit. Isn't it a good thing we're exporting? (I'd get it if your argument was against the coal power plants, I don't get why selling abroad for a profit is bad in general.)
- t0bia_s 4y agoWhen you import it back with that price, I find it immoral. Who decide to sell it back to country wher it came from with 6 time higher price? It's called "lichva". Germans have cheaper prices and also 3 times more average income. Also what's the point to make own people suffer and be poor by this business? It's absolutely ridiculous.
- tasuki 4y agoI can't follow your comment, apart from seeing that you're outraged about the situation. It's a global world. If someone else is willing to pay more for the energy than us, we should sell it to them and use the money we earn to buy the things we value more, things we're willing to pay more for.