When it comes to anything contentious, everybody is going to be biased about the interpretation. You're probably better off making your own mind up about these

When it comes to anything contentious, everybody is going to be biased about the interpretation. You're probably better off making your own mind up about these kinds of things. But I'd say there's a few journalists like Glenn Greenwald who maintain some credibility. What characteristic makes any journalist credible? One hallmark of credibility for a journalist is that he's actually willing to call out his own idealogical "team" for their bullshit. Here was Glenn's take on this. Your interpretation of this may of course vary. https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1601594896594644993 https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1601594896594644993 > The weekly meetings @yoyoel and other Twitter censors had with FBI, DHS, etc. constituted a union of state and corporate power to control the flow of information to the citizenry. > "Fascism" has become abused to the point of meaninglessness but that's a defining hallmark.