2 ms·
The difference is that no one is willing to pour billions into Atari. Atari, SA really struggled to find investors. Also, the problem with Theranos was exactl
by cedilla 4y ago
The difference is that no one is willing to pour billions into Atari. Atari, SA really struggled to find investors.
Also, the problem with Theranos was exactly that the board members were not from industry, but retired politicians or diplomats.
- kennend3 4y agoI think you entirly missed the point. As others in this thread have posted, sometimes board members are just "window dressing". Sometimes big names put there to attract investors/show stability of the company, etc. Perhaps Nolan contributes, perhaps not - i dont follow the issue that closely to speak on that. My point is just to do your due diligence and not depend on "so and so is on the board".