3 ms·
Maybe my point is just that those things should not be called CRDTs. There are conflicts in the basic operations and you just decide on a case by case basis ho
by danbruc 4y ago
Maybe my point is just that those things should not be called CRDTs. There are conflicts in the basic operations and you just decide on a case by case basis how
to resolve them which makes the entire construct look superficially like a CRDT but kind of ignores the core characteristic of CRDTs, namely that the operations never conflict.
- preseinger 4y agoLWWRegister does provide the deterministic guarantee that operations never conflict. The "problem" is just that the decision is basically arbitrary.