4 ms·
"""No, it's not. Adding a new built-in type that doesn't participate in type-checking in any meaningful way just clutters the language.""" 1) It's not about ty
by dextorious 15y ago
"""No, it's not. Adding a new built-in type that doesn't participate in type-checking in any meaningful way just clutters the language."""
1) It's not about type-checking, it's about reading code.
2) It's not like type-checking is C's strong point.