Here's a book published in Britain in 1990, titled "Family and party games", which mentions calls it "BuzzFizz", but isn't quite the same a "FizzBuzz" ("57" is

Here's a book published in Britain in 1990, titled "Family and party games", which mentions calls it "BuzzFizz", but isn't quite the same a "FizzBuzz" ("57" is read a "buzz fizz" because the "buzz" replaces the 5 and "fizz" replaces the "7" and 57 is neither a multiple of 5 nor 7.) https://archive.org/details/familypartygames0000diag/page/122/mode/2up?q=buzz https://archive.org/details/familypartygames0000diag/page/12... Here's another British book from 1990 (reprinted in 1992), where FizzBuzz are for multiples of 3 and 5: https://archive.org/details/algebra0000maso/page/10/mode/2up?q=buzz https://archive.org/details/algebra0000maso/page/10/mode/2up... While from 1990 here's a US book which says "Fizz-Buzz-Fizz" and "Buzz-Fizz-Buzz" are well known, before describing "Reverse Buzz". It uses numbers with 7 in the base-10 representation, and numbers which are multiples of 7: https://archive.org/details/greatgamestoplay0000harr/page/78/mode/2up?q=buzz https://archive.org/details/greatgamestoplay0000harr/page/78... And another 1990s book from the US does the multiples-of-5-and-7: https://archive.org/details/hopscotchhangman00magu/page/36/mode/2up?q=fizz https://archive.org/details/hopscotchhangman00magu/page/36/m... Conclusion: the game has been in the US and the UK for a long time.