> "Our team was given extensive, unfiltered access to Twitter's internal communications and systems" One of the journalists in question. Also the wording in y

> "Our team was given extensive, unfiltered access to Twitter's internal communications and systems" One of the journalists in question. Also the wording in your tweets leaves some wriggle room: > For security purposes, the screenshots requested [...] Are we going to get some transparency from Twitter about exactly what tools/communications were accessible by the journalists in question? Otherwise this seems to be an exact repeat of what Twitter has already been doing for years, except now it's a private company and accountable to only one absurdly rich individual.