3 ms·
If they are impossible to defend, why did he participate in a Munk debate where his sole purpose was to defend them? Clearly he doesn't agree with your premise.
by chitowneats 4y ago
If they are impossible to defend, why did he participate in a Munk debate where his sole purpose was to defend them? Clearly he doesn't agree with your premise. For that he deserves criticism.
- throwaway09223 4y agoThe phrase "impossible to defend" implies a successful defense.