3 ms·
How much of that is him vs the media being impossible to defend at this point?
by scifibestfi 4y ago
How much of that is him vs the media being impossible to defend at this point?
- chitowneats 4y agoIf they are impossible to defend, why did he participate in a Munk debate where his sole purpose was to defend them? Clearly he doesn't agree with your premise. For that he deserves criticism.
- throwaway09223 4y agoThe phrase "impossible to defend" implies a successful defense.
- gnicholas 4y agoIn the pre-debate vote, trust in media had a 4 point edge (52/48), and in the open-minded poll, 82% said they were open to changing their mind. He and Michelle Goldberg were beaten soundly by a guy whose first name Malcom got wrong, and a guy whose last name Malcom got wrong (repeatedly, in both cases).