This is terrible logic, as when does a corporation performing highly influential campaigns ever have the public interest at heart? In which case, the easiest wa

This is terrible logic, as when does a corporation performing highly influential campaigns ever have the public interest at heart? In which case, the easiest way to show why this is a bad idea, is imagine if the roles were reversed (i.e. social media was instilling values you didn't agree with and thought were backwards). I don't have to agree with either side to think that allowing a corporation to have such influence over the formation of children is a terrible idea. Especially when said corporations have a long history of scandals (TikTok bowing to CCP, Facebook and Cambridge Analytics, Twitter...) The only reason I can think of, for why we would be OK with this, is not a principled stance - rather, you just support the political views social media is instilling.