4 ms·
Nobody's forcing anybody to deliver your teriyaki. You're paying a premium so you don't have to leave the house. Someone's freely choosing to earn some money to
by kodyo 4y ago
Nobody's forcing anybody to deliver your teriyaki. You're paying a premium so you don't have to leave the house. Someone's freely choosing to earn some money to provide your premium service. They've decided that delivering your thing is better for them than not delivering your thing.
The overthinking involved in this stuff is bizarre.
- IfOnlyYouKnew 4y ago“They’ve decided that picking the cotton is better than refusing to do so”. Edit, because people share a characteristic with heavy metals: the point is that a “choice” made under economic duress is not made freely. Slavery is an extreme example used to make the point more obvious. The threat of violence used to compel people to work the fields is obviously worse than, but not necessarily qualitatively different from, the threat of abject poverty if one refuses to take low-paying insecure jobs.
- kodyo 4y agoComments like this are why I don't believe in democracy anymore.
- Wohlf 4y agoFood delivery is not even in the same universe as chattel slavery, they're completely incomparable.
- pessimizer 4y agoYou can't just say this, you have to say why. It's going to be a hard case to explain how you can't compare two types of work. I'm not even sure how you can explain what free market labor is without referring to slavery, or explain what slavery is without referring to free market labor i.e. I don't think it's possible not to compare them and rationally talk about either of them.
- melvyn2 4y agoNope, 300 years ago we had slavery and now we have gig work. I think that's the same universe ;) In all seriousness, refusing to compare two things because you think they're "just too different" is simply acting irrationally. Look at the objectives, pressures, and outputs of each system and you may see more similarities than you'd like.
- xwdv 4y agoYea, this is pretty much how I rationalize it. Shitty work but hey if someone’s willing to do it I won’t care. Everyone is different.
- giraffe_lady 4y agoYes absolutely do not think about the conditions under which someone would be willing to do it. What would have to change in your life for you to be willing to? Don't think about it!
- xwdv 4y agoI don’t understand.
- kodyo 4y agoI would have to lose 30 years of work experience, all of the skills I've learned, and my professional network. I might have done it when I was younger and didn't have any of that, but that kind of work didn't really exist beyond pizza delivery. I worked at a video rental store, instead. Crappy jobs are a motivation to improve.
- giraffe_lady 4y ago> I would have to lose 30 years of work experience, all of the skills I've learned, and my professional network. One bad head injury could do all that and more. What are you going to improve then? My point here is that given other choices, people don't freely choose precarious low wage work. It's safe to assume that people doing those jobs have pressures and constraints on them that limit their choices. This is why they're "willing" to do shitty work. You could be coerced into it too, given the right conditions. Understand the incentives, don't just justify it away as "freely chosen" because it isn't. To some extent that's true of all of us, but not to the same extent and the difference is meaningful.
- xwdv 4y agoIf everything is a response to incentives then by this logic you could also say a software engineer is coerced into their career because of pressure put on by the cost of their lifestyle. People doing shitty work might not have incentive to do anything else.