3 ms·
Quick google says regenerative breaking has ~65% efficiency at energy recovery, but that includes the 10-20% lost when converting stored energy back into kineti
by malfist 4y ago
Quick google says regenerative breaking has ~65% efficiency at energy recovery, but that includes the 10-20% lost when converting stored energy back into kinetic energy.
So it sounds like regenerative breaking would covert ~75%-85% of kinetic energy into stored chemical energy. I'd expect to see similar reduction in tire and brake wear as well, maybe even more it probably depends on how break dust is generated, if it has a curve where more is generated with greater breaking force applied, by dropping the force on a break pad to 15% of it's previous value we might see an even greater reduction.
This is all speculation though, I am not a physicist.
- qqtt 4y agoThe energy efficiency of turning regenerative braking into energy isn’t really related to how regenerative braking can fully stop a vehicle without using the brake pads. Even if the regenerative braking energy efficiency were 1% - if it fully stops the car without using a brake pad that entire wear & tear (& dust) goes away.
- vagrantJin 4y agoThanks for pointing this out. Many arguments here are about regenerative braking - which does not the address the issue of tire wear.