2 ms·

Yeah lets name them bro, then we can have articles like: "Iranian whistleblower found dead with signs of torture." Much better!

• Alir3z4 4y ago
  I find it hard to believe that in an era of smartphones and all these gadgets, there's no picture, video or any other type of evidence except "unnamed sources".
  • mcv 4y ago
    As adamsmith143 pointed out, if that evidence exists, it's probably better to keep it out of sight of Iranian authorities. If that means you don't believe it, then that's what it is. Exposing sources is a bad idea.
  • adamsmith143 4y ago
    Of course the evidence exists lol but you don't burn your sources if you ever want another hot tip and certainly not when it likely means a horrible death for them if you do.
    • Alir3z4 4y ago
      I like how you're confident the evidence exists by seeing 0 evidence. Sure. Apparently I should also believe Iran has WMD and NATO should attack it. It's coming from a unnamed sources.
      • adamsmith143 4y ago
        Journalists != CIA/DOD for the majority of cases so this isn't really the own you think it is.