3 ms·
Everyone is dancing around talking about everything other than the clear issue. If a user grants someone rights via a platform, then the explicit trust is that
by weego 4y ago
Everyone is dancing around talking about everything other than the clear issue.
If a user grants someone rights via a platform, then the explicit trust is that the granted party will abide by the platforms TOS in the same way the grantee would.
If the TOS is broken by the granted party, that is them breaking the TOS via a victims extended trust. It is not a true reflection of the situation to say that the grantee broke the TOS.
- jolux 4y agoIf the grantee is using their OAuth integration for platform abuse, that’s not the fault of the victim, and it’s surely a TOS violation of itself. They should have their API access revoked and the victim’s account should be restored.
- sowbug 4y agoTrust is intentional, not mechanical.
- lolinder 4y agoI think you agree with OP, they just mixed up grantee and grantor (they use "granted" for grantee and "grantee" for grantor): > If a user grants someone rights via a platform, then the explicit trust is that the granted party will abide by the platforms TOS in the same way the grantee would.
- jolux 4y agoYeah, OP edited their post to clarify. I do agree.