2 ms·
The problem is that for a lot of people “hate and crazy” is a euphemism for “political ideas I disagree with”. This isn’t new or original. Anyone can classify
by user3939382 4y ago
The problem is that for a lot of people “hate and crazy” is a euphemism for “political ideas I disagree with”.
This isn’t new or original. Anyone can classify their political opponents as crazy, dumb, misguided, “hateful” is the new one, ignorant, *ist.
I think a healthier framing is, people who disagree with me politically have their reasons for doing so and the best for everyone is if we have a dialog.
- HDThoreaun 4y agoI think the problem is that you can't accept that twitter users don't want to engage with your bs, and that lead to twitter shadow banning it.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- user3939382 4y agoThey banned political speech they disagreed with, and it sounds like you're happy they did. > your bs I have no dog in the fight. > twitter users don't want to engage with The country, however, is pretty evenly divided along ideological lines so there is no homogeneous "twitter users" group.
- michaelmrose 4y agoYou are free to run your own website if you don't like your placement in trending topics or users feeds kind of like you can share your videos on your blog if ABC wont carry it.
- user3939382 4y ago> You are free to run your own website I am, but that doesn’t solve the problem with Twitter manipulating our elections, does it?
- jacobsenscott 4y agoThere's a point where this "all opinions have merit" argument is just nihilism and lazy thinking.