25 ms·
>Also, old money shamelessly flaunts their wealth. Hospital naming rights, charity events, art collections, etc. I think charity type stuff is seen a bit diffe
by modo_mario 4y ago
>Also, old money shamelessly flaunts their wealth. Hospital naming rights, charity events, art collections, etc.
I think charity type stuff is seen a bit different than flashy ridiculously expensive cars and such.
It's a way that might be seen as showing off but is not perceived as badly and so less likely to get you noticed in a less desirable way.
Similarly those art collections unless lent/donated don't leave the estate and are hardly flashy
- gizmo 4y agoOf course it's perceived differently, that's the entire point! A $2000 Brunello Cucinelli sweater is conspicuous consumption just like an oversized Gucci belt. And the art world is small. People know who the collectors are.
- adamsmith143 4y agoThe difference is that every joe blow knows what Gucci looks like but only certain people, if any, can spot a sweater like that. You are signalling to completely different groups. Honestly I'd be surprised if anyone outside diehard fashion "experts" could spot a subdued Brunello sweater at all so the intent there is not to signal at all.