Aside from the subject matter of the article itself, this caught my attention: > I ended up using four articles for this experiment: > Most Promising Crypto P

Aside from the subject matter of the article itself, this caught my attention: > I ended up using four articles for this experiment: > Most Promising Crypto Projects Of 2015 > Top Stablecoins Of 2020 > Best Crypto Exchanges Of 2020 > Biggest Cryptocurrencies By Market Cap Of 2020 > …which between them described 54 different crypto projects1. Looking back at these from our position in late 2022 Wouldn't a time scale of 10 to 20 years be better to gauge the trustworthiness of something like this? And if that's not possible due to crypto being new, aren't all of these points kind of moot and guessing at best, in regards to absolute claims, not niche use cases? Would you use a bank that opened just a year or two ago and consider putting a significant part of your money there? Would you use a framework or an operating system, or a language that is a year or two old? I guess it depends on one's risk tolerance and the desire to take advantage of perceived benefits (or just speculate, in the case of crypto). Though my risk tolerance is lower than that and I'd be late to the crypto "party" in particular, personally.