> What is your actual point here? that e2e encryption by a third party does not give you privacy from the US government if that third party can remotely contro

> What is your actual point here? that e2e encryption by a third party does not give you privacy from the US government if that third party can remotely control or update your device and is subject to US laws. it is a direct reply to the assertion made in the GP: "The adversary is someone attacking the service provider, like a hacker or a government with a warrant, and getting access to Apple's storage of your data."