16 ms·
Right, Twitter provided their own definition which delicately tiptoes around the unsavory issue and Weiss expanded the definition to suit her own self-interests
by bavell 4y ago
Right, Twitter provided their own definition which delicately tiptoes around the unsavory issue and Weiss expanded the definition to suit her own self-interests.
How does that make what "most people" would consider not matter? Seems like a non-sequitur to me but maybe I'm not understanding your point.
- tptacek 4y agoBecause the thread is about Weiss's claims. If you want to talk about how Twitter's definition of shadow-banning is problematic, or their moderation practices in general, start another top-level thread.
- rhaksw 4y agoAgreed, it's rare for any service to outright say "we shadow ban" as done here [1] for example. And, most services still use a form of shadow moderation [2]. So it's perfectly fine to discuss here. Attempts to shut down conversation are just that. [1] https://getstream.io/blog/feature-announcement-shadow-ban/ https://getstream.io/blog/feature-announcement-shadow-ban/ [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33916414 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33916414