>Same with cash. Which governments increasingly constrain, for this reason. Yet there are not as many people commenting enthusiastically about wanting cash to d

>Same with cash. Which governments increasingly constrain, for this reason. Yet there are not as many people commenting enthusiastically about wanting cash to disappear / fail, or suggesting similar measures against it. (KYC, AML...) Why is cash okay, but _digital equivalent_ is not? Crypto is not a digital equivalent to cash no matter how much you say it. I can pay my tax organisation with cash. They explicitly list the acceptable forms of payment. I cannot send them any sort of crypto currency. Cash is also legal tender. There are times where not accepting cash could have legal consequences. I can reject crypto as much as I want. I can't help but think these lines of argument are intentionally deceptive. If you just repeat it enough times, other people will as well.