4 ms·
> I don’t believe Joe is a criminal, but my personal opinions about his guilt don’t matter. Then why bring it up? > My analysis will treat this as an acciden
by gsk22 4y ago
> I don’t believe Joe is a criminal, but my personal opinions about his guilt don’t matter.
Then why bring it up?
> My analysis will treat this as an accident.
Isn't the point of an analysis to determine what happened? Not to start with a preconceived idea and make the analysis fit that?
It's hard to trust a source repeatedly claiming to be neutral after spending the first few paragraphs espousing their biases.
- jasonhansel 4y agoUsually, in a blameless analysis, you avoid overtly criticizing anyone or assigning blame, but you at least say what different people did. The OP doesn't seem to go into much detail about the exact actions Sullivan took, which seems like a major omission.
- tptacek 4y agoIt's not about his actions, it's about the processes that enabled them.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]