2 ms·
They're saying the lack of GC is an advantage over golang, not that it's a deficiency. Or if you're suggesting a GC to solve the memory unsafety, a GC only sol
by Arnavion 4y ago
They're saying the lack of GC is an advantage over golang, not that it's a deficiency.
Or if you're suggesting a GC to solve the memory unsafety, a GC only solves leaks and doesn't do anything for use-after-free or simultaneous unexpected mutations.
- pverghese 4y agoI'm saying you have the option to use a gc or not. It's as simple as changing the allocator you use