4 ms·
Do you mean that the chapter on priming has been debunked (as I believe Kahneman acknowledges) or is there more wrong than that?
by kalkin 4y ago
Do you mean that the chapter on priming has been debunked (as I believe Kahneman acknowledges) or is there more wrong than that?
- depr 4y agoThere is more. https://replicationindex.com/2020/12/30/a-meta-scientific-perspective-on-thinking-fast-and-slow/ https://replicationindex.com/2020/12/30/a-meta-scientific-pe... lists many more chapters, and one of the comments refers to this paper https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691620964172 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691620964172 about system1/2 specifically: > Popular dual-process models of thinking have long conceived intuition and deliberation as two qualitatively different processes. Single-process-model proponents claim that the difference is a matter of degree and not of kind. Psychologists have been debating the dual-process/single-process question for at least 30 years. In the present article, I argue that it is time to leave the debate behind. I present a critical evaluation of the key arguments and critiques and show that—contra both dual- and single-model proponents—there is currently no good evidence that allows one to decide the debate. Moreover, I clarify that even if the debate were to be solved, it would be irrelevant for psychologists because it does not advance the understanding of the processing mechanisms underlying human thinking.