> only under very specific circumstances you would be infringing copyright laws It's the reverse of this. Any work public or not by default is all rights reser

> only under very specific circumstances you would be infringing copyright laws It's the reverse of this. Any work public or not by default is all rights reserved to the owner. The fair use doctrine provides an exception from this if you meet specific criteria. An extreme example, you cannot just upload a complete movie and just add "credit to disney". > you wouldn't be infringing copyright either, you would just be breaking privacy laws/terms. Maybe we're from different countries, but with US law it would be either under theft, the computer fraud/abuse act and/or copyright violations, there are no privacy laws applicable here unless we're talking about PII. Extracting very specific examples from an article or blog is almost certainly going to fall under fair use. However I've seen several cases where it essentially just returns an entire article as the answer which would certainly be legally ambiguous.