3 ms·
Hmm, wikipedia (admittedly english wikipedia) considers it a diacritic despite the fact that it's considered it's own letter. Is there a different generic term
by nicoburns 4y ago
Hmm, wikipedia (admittedly english wikipedia) considers it a diacritic despite the fact that it's considered it's own letter. Is there a different generic term for "typographic mark above the main body of a letter"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%91 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%91