2 ms·
The secretary of defense mentioned "deterrence" as part of the reasoning. Maybe not-so-coincidentally, the aircraft (at least as they showed it) skips the old s
by Rebelgecko 4y ago
The secretary of defense mentioned "deterrence" as part of the reasoning. Maybe not-so-coincidentally, the aircraft (at least as they showed it) skips the old school black paint job for one that looks more like anti-flash white[0].
Part of it is probably also that this is a refinement of an existing aircraft and not anything with drastically different capabilities-- if you're planning on war with the US, you're probably already thinking about B-2s, and if you're worried about B-2s then a B-21 isn't that different.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-flash_white https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-flash_white
- jabl 4y agoLooks more like a typical gray color that practically all Western air forces use today, than anti-flash white. I'd speculate the implications of this are: - They plan on operating it during the day as well as night, so they need better protection against visual observation? - The B2 was much darker due to the coating technology it used wasn't compatible with lighter grays? And operating only at night it didn't really matter?