3 ms·
You're confused, copyright != antitrust violations. Both sources you provide have zero mentions of the word 'copyright' in them. Those lawsuits have to do wit
by moralestapia 4y ago
You're confused, copyright != antitrust violations.
Both sources you provide have zero mentions of the word 'copyright' in them.
Those lawsuits have to do with Google's dominating the search market and using that to their advantage in ways that are allegedly unfair.
Copyright law actually allows a service like Google to exist in the first place.
- drusepth 4y agoAccording to OP's model, for anyone wondering: >Copyright infringement and antitrust violations are two distinct types of improper use. Plagiarism is an ethical violation that occurs when someone attempts to pass off someone else's work or ideas as their own, without properly giving credit to the original source. It is not against the law, but can have serious consequences such as failing grades, termination, and difficulty finding new employment. On the other hand, copyright infringement occurs when a party takes an action that implicates one or more of the rights listed above without authorization from the copyright owner or an applicable exception or limitation in the copyright law, such as fair use. The most common antitrust violations fall into two categories: agreements to restrain competition and efforts to acquire a monopoly.
- stevewatson301 4y agoThe possibility that a LLM could trigger a copyright violation strengthens the narrative that Google is harming smaller business, and thus can easily be used as a data point in an antitrust lawsuit.
- isthispermanent 4y agoYes, thank you. I’m neither confused nor disagree with you. I simply cited the most recent, easily found examples where Google ran afoul for rich results. There are plenty of examples out there, as mentioned the ones prior to the recent shopping ones. Feel free to dig.