3 ms·
Thinking more on this... I don't think any of these sites will live if they get big enough. And if enough of them pop up it'll draw tons of attention from conte
by isthispermanent 4y ago
Thinking more on this... I don't think any of these sites will live if they get big enough. And if enough of them pop up it'll draw tons of attention from content sites.
If you want to show that data you'll end up having to work out a license from StackOverflow. Possible, but far more difficult than the current ease of plug-and-play GPT drop-in.
Do we really think Google hasn't thought of this exact thing already?
- jchw 4y agoStack Overflow user content is licensed under the Creative Commons license, so it's possible you actually could satisfy the license terms. That said, IANAL, and I have no idea if it's possible to fulfill the SA clause without distributing the model, or something like that.
- stevewatson301 4y agoGoogle is already working on LaMDA and Imagen for conversational search experiences, which is why these projects also wax poetic about "AI safety" -- you don't want to synthesize a politically incorrect or socially unacceptable response to a question asked. Apart from the copyright issues that parent mentions, there's also the issue of LLM spewing BS confidently, which is why Google has been hesitant to roll it out as their default.
- isthispermanent 4y agoAgreed. This post sums up the other issues outside of copyright that these types of services are certain to run into… 1. DeepMind 2. Infrastructure 3. Trust 4. Freshness 5. Habit Breaking https://www.maxinomics.com/blog/fade-the-chatgpt-hype https://www.maxinomics.com/blog/fade-the-chatgpt-hype