> The fact that he admits that he sat on this for eight years (regardless of reason) means he was not actively defending his intellectual property. I'm not sur

> The fact that he admits that he sat on this for eight years (regardless of reason) means he was not actively defending his intellectual property. I'm not sure what this means. Copyright doesn't need to be defended. In any case copyright is a big mess without a signed contract. This just muddles the waters even more.