This is a nitpick, but it's strange to me that the video title is "I Accidentally got SBF to Admit to Fraud," when the video starts with a discussion of how he

This is a nitpick, but it's strange to me that the video title is "I Accidentally got SBF to Admit to Fraud," when the video starts with a discussion of how he studied SBF's interviews & strategized a line of questioning that would be maximally damaging. I'm not saying he shouldn't have done so (I'm pretty ambivalent, I think this is an important question but I'm uncomfortable with the spectacle here and the calls for SBF's head), just that it's weird to present it at an accident.