3 ms·

Why did they change they article to a link to the google cache? Google has since re-cached the page, and the cache now links to itself. I was clicking on that

• megablast 15y ago
  Well, I guess for the obvious reason that they couldn't handle the hits.
  • ionfish 15y ago
    They could have just made a static version with wget.
  • sirn 15y ago
    IMHO, the first thing to do when you could not keep up the traffic is to use Coral Cache. Just redirect to your.domain.com.nyud.net/article. Done.
• lucaspiller 15y ago
  It is a bit stupid... Surely just loading that small article WP must be thrashing their database. This works (for now): http://viewtext.org/article?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aorensoftware.com%2Fblog%2F2011%2F12%2F24%2Fdeath-to-ds_store%2F&format= http://viewtext.org/article?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aorensoftwa...
  • StavrosK 15y ago
    This'll work forever: http://cache.historious.net/cached/1628132/ http://cache.historious.net/cached/1628132/
    • sneak 15y ago
      That's what they said about Yucca Mountain and time_t!
      • StavrosK 15y ago
        * For small values of forever.
• palish 15y ago
  Heh. Self-referential cache: http://db.tt/qAfMnTjl http://db.tt/qAfMnTjl
• akie 15y ago
  Here's a Readability link of the full article: http://www.readability.com/articles/geihcmwz?legacy_bookmarklet=1 http://www.readability.com/articles/geihcmwz?legacy_bookmark...
  • StavrosK 15y ago
    Gone too, try this: http://cache.historious.net/cached/1628132/ http://cache.historious.net/cached/1628132/