4 ms·
Why are these low quality resources being upvoted? Not only is there basically no content here, but some of it requires signup. You get more than this from read
by mudrockbestgirl 4y ago
Why are these low quality resources being upvoted? Not only is there basically no content here, but some of it requires signup. You get more than this from reading a single page of PyTorch documentation.
The web is flooded with Deep Learning tutorials that are both free and much higher quality than this. I can't tell if this is vote manipulation or if HN just upvotes anything with Deep Learning in the title without ever checking the link.
Personally I flagged this because I don't think low-quality content marketing stuff like this belongs on the front page.
- threatofrain 4y agoWhat’s a shortlist of top recommendations?
- mudrockbestgirl 4y agoIt's difficult because there are hundreds of really good courses and I don't keep track. It's almost a full time job to just keep track of this stuff given how much there is. Search for one of these "awesome Deep Learning lectures" Github repos and you will find them. The Stanford courses (224, 231, and the Transformer one) are a safe bet. In general, I would recommend university courses where the lectures are online. There are a lot of them. Fast.ai is supposed to be good as well from what I've heard, but I don't have experience with that myself.
- tosh 4y agoI submitted it because I saw it on twitter today (via one of these "new" tweets that show up in your timeline even if you don't follow the user). I'm currently going through the course and found it a pretty good overview to get into deep learning but I guess it depends on where you are coming from. I only found the multiple choice questions/answers can be improved a bit but I mainly paid attention to the videos.