3 ms·
Opt-in is much safer for donors. Imagine you are wealthy guy needing organ transplant. From buying 23andMe (or similar company) data you figure out there are se
by Hitton 4y ago
Opt-in is much safer for donors. Imagine you are wealthy guy needing organ transplant. From buying 23andMe (or similar company) data you figure out there are several potential donors. In case of opt-out you can just arrange accident to happen and you have your organ.
- hardware2win 4y agoIt sounds like very theoretical scenerio. If somebody wants to murder somebody for his organs Why he cannot uh... do it just fine regardless of his opt status and literally take his organs without going thru "official" way? Im asking because opt in by default seems to save way, way more people than your very theoretocal, probably not happening scenerio would affect
- Hitton 4y agoYou can't be serious. One would be "accident", but other would be obvious murder.
- hardware2win 4y agoHow arranging an accident isnt murder?
- Hitton 4y agoI'm not sure if you are trying to troll me, but I'll spell it out for you anyway. scenario A (opt-out) - arranging accident. involves only few people (those who arrange it), can be fairly covert scenario B (opt-in) - stealing organs from body, either extremely overt (nobody is gonna think that body with missing organs died in accident, that's why I wrote "obvious") or involving many more people (there would have to be multiple members of hospital staff involved in stealing the organs), high risk scheme (again if found that the organs were stolen, suddenly it's "obvious" it probably wasn't accident)