3 ms·
It absolutely reads as if his contribution is significant enough that he should be be considered one of the creators. > giving money to back-office staff who h
by Kiro 4y ago
It absolutely reads as if his contribution is significant enough that he should be be considered one of the creators.
> giving money to back-office staff who had just arrived in the last year, and had zero creative input into the game [...] I had helped him create the actual game
The way he puts down regular employees, making it sound like his poem is obviously more important than whatever a mere employee does.
- mort96 4y agoYes, he considers himself "one of the creators of Minecraft". Because he is one of the creators of Minecraft; he created a part of the game. He doesn't consider himself "the creator of Minecraft", as you claimed. You can think he puts down regular employees and makes himself seem more important than is warranted. You may think his contribution is tiny compared to the contribution of people who marketed the game or made the website. I may even agree. But that's not what I take issue with. I take issue with you misrepresenting his words by claiming he thinks he's "the creator of Minecraft", which is completely unfair.
- Kiro 4y ago"The creator" and "one of the creators" are not mutually exclusive. Both can be true. > Steve Jobs is the founder of Apple Inc., along with Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne. Anyway, I changed the comment to "one of the creators".
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- BlueTemplar 4y agoIt's more complicated because he's one of the latecomers : by the point he was asked to do this work Minecraft had already been released and was already a massive success.
- mort96 4y agoI don't see how that's relevant, other than pointing out that his part of the creation was fairly minor, which I haven't disagreed with.