> The claim is that IPv4 + NAT + bad firewall is better than IPv6 + bad firewall. Even that is not true: - It takes half-minute to scan an IPv4 public IP (NAT

> The claim is that IPv4 + NAT + bad firewall is better than IPv6 + bad firewall. Even that is not true: - It takes half-minute to scan an IPv4 public IP (NAT) for vulnerabilities. - Good luck and have fun to scan a /64 for a potentially vulnerable machine. See you next century. - And if it is not enough: most internet box support UPnP/NAT-PMP that allow any malware to get your NAT wild opened.